On May 4, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Daniel Charles Ross wrote:

> I wouldn't spend $200 on an image without first checking in on iStockphoto [http://istockphoto.com] for as good a piece of art for typically waaay less co$t.


An iStockphoto image has long been in contention. But some key folks like the Getty one better. Since the capital campaign is important, they think it may be a justified purchase.


IF YOU HAVE TIME, PLEASE, take a look at the two images at this link. Let me know what you think of them. (I think it's an interesting comparison.) Cost matters, yes, but the effect the images have matters as well.

http://lasersaveinc.com/Goldfish-Faceoff/GoldfishFaceoff.jpg

Chuck M


--
This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://www.LassoSoft.com/
Search the list archives: http://www.ListSearch.com/InDesign/Browse/
Manage your subscription: http://www.ListSearch.com/InDesign/